'A New Mexican Rebecca':
Imaging Pueblo Women1
BARBARA A. BABCOCK
As commodities, women are thus two things at once: utilitarian
objects and bearers of value.
–Luce Irigary
Colonial power has always included a double colonization of the female
gender and expressed itself especially through this double conquest.
–Susanne Kappeler
This essay is a pastiche of images, quotations, and reflections–the
shards of more than a decade of studying ceramics and culture. It's a
re-visionary meditation on the imaging of Pueblo women, resulting
from my leaving the Southwest and my work with Pueblo women
and potteries in 1987 and returning to it after a year in the Ivy
League. When I picked up a travel book, the Insight Guide (figure 1),
in Flagstaff in the fall of 1988, I realized that the contemporary
Pueblo woman posed and encircled to sell the Southwest was but the
latest chapter in a long story of the domestication and aestheticization
of the Other–a narrative of more than a century of oppression,
appropriation, and commodification–and I knew I had to write
about it. The images of olla maidens came flooding back, an endless
parade of Pueblo women with pots on their heads, like the Zuni
procession at Gallup Ceremonial in recent decades: an etching of
Santo Domingo women that accompanied the Emory Report of
1848 (figure 2); a Zuni woman photographed by Hillers c. 1880 (figure 3); a San Juan "mudwoman" (figure 4) captured by Carter Hanison c. 1910.
I recall the frustrations of those years of research–how invisible,
buried historic figurative ceramics were and are in catalogues and
collections of Pueblo pottery; how ubiquitous the classic ollas or
tinajas or water jars. I listen to Nora Naranjo-Morse's "mudwoman"
poems and laugh with her Pearlene (figure 5)–a 1987 ceramic self-portrait that disrupts this traditional Anglo narrative of use and
beauty. Pearlene is "the antithesis of the characteristics of Pueblo
women that anthropologists love to point out"–characteristics embodied
in countless "mudwoman' images (see figure 4).
More than a century ago, as well as today, domestic scenes of
Pueblo women and potteries, such as those published in Cushing's
My Adventures in Zuni (1882) (figure 6), have eclipsed images such
as that of "Indian Pottery" (figure 7), taken by Ben Wittick between
1878 and 1881, of pottery for sale in Jake Gold's Santa Fe shop.
Marketed as "primitive idols," such figurative ceramics were and are
frequently described as "eccentrics" and "grotesques" and dismissed
as "tourist trash." One cannot help but ask if there is a system of
power that authorizes certain Pueblo cultural representations while
blocking, prohibiting, and invalidating others (Owens 1983: 59).
What about these very "relations of power whereby one portion of
humanity can select, value, and collect the pure products of others"
(Clifford 1988: 213)? What about the way that Anglo-American
anthropologists, as well as artists, have been imagining, describing,
romanticizing, and fetishizing the Pueblo Southwest for over a
century?2 To cite but one example, more than fifty years ago in her
foreword to First Penthouse Dwellers of America (1938: v-vi), anthropologist
Ruth Underhill introduced the "Indian Americans of the Pueblos" as follows:
Through the streets of cities in the American Southwest, walk
certain brilliantly colored figures, swathed in blankets and with
bright headbands over long black hair cut across the forehead
like that of a medieval page. They pass quietly through the modern
throng, bearing bundles of rugs on their back or dangling
strings of silver and turquoise. Or they sit beneath a roadside
shelter of boughs, the pottery of their ancient craft before the
days of the potter's wheel, spread out before them. These are
the Pueblo Indians ... the peaceful Hopi ... the gentle Zuni
... the Keres ... the Tanoans.
A few years later, these olla maidens appeared on the cover of her
1944 Pueblo Crafts (figure 8). And this prompts me to ask why the
study of pottery has generated more literature than any other aspect
of Southwest culture? Why was Nampeyo the symbol of Hopi cultre in the minds
of white Americans (figure 9), and why did María Martinez (see figure 19) become the single most famous Native American artist?
Imaged again and again in a variety of media and contexts–most
recently a 1990 Santa Fe T-shirt (figure 10), these southwestern
objects of desire, these mudwomen carrying, shaping containers of
"symbolic capital" raise ambiguous and disturbing questions about
the aesthetic appropriation of non-Western others–issues of race,
gender, and power.3 What does it mean not only that the Other is
frequently represented as female–the feminization that Said
discusses in Orientalism–but that women and the things they make are
both symbols and sources of cultural identity, survival, and social
continuity and also mediators between cultures and vehicles of
exchange and change? For centuries, pottery has been the primary
Pueblo trade item and pottery is women's work. Not surprisingly,
pottery making has played a key role over the past century in the
transition from an agrarian to a cash economy–a process that began
with the Smithsonian Institution's first collecting expedition to the
southwestern Pueblos in 1879 and was accelerated by the coming of
the railroad in the 1880s and Fred Harvey's/Santa Fe Railroad's
marketing campaigns in the early decades of this century. Women sold
potteries and demonstrated pottery making to railroad passengers,
and images of women with pots were sold on Santa Fe Railroad
postcards and playing cards (figure 11), as well as decorating
booklets, brochures, and calendars.
"Ancient Indian pottery," a New York Tribune reporter wrote in
1882, "has been sought after through the past few years with great
zeal. The custom of the average tourist, in seizing upon everything in
the way of pottery that bears the semblance of age has made such a
demand for 'prehistoric' wares that the ingenious mind of the native
has led him to devise means of gratifying the aesthetic longings of
his cultured brother. The method is simple. The Indian just
manufactures it in proportion to the wants of the trade."4
This raises what I see as a key question, a paradoxical, problematic,
and politically charged situation: what happens when indigenous
Pueblo signifiers of stability–women and potteries-become valued
items of exchange, cultural brokers, and agents of change precisely
because they embody a synchronic essentialism for postindustrial
Anglo consumers? Why has a traditionally dressed woman shaping
or carrying an olla, a water jar, become the classic metonymic
misrepresentation of the Pueblo, and why has Anglo America invested so
much in this image for more than a century?
In The Conquest of America Todorov suggests part of the answer.
If, he argues, "instead of regarding the other simply as an object, he
[she] were considered as a subject capable of producing objects
which one might then possess (figure 12), the chain would be
extended by a link–the intermediary subject–and thereby multiply
to infinity the number of objects ultimately possessed. This transformation,
however, necessitates that the intermediary subject be maintained
in precisely this role of subject-producer-of-objects and kept
from becoming like ourselves" (1984: 175-76). Examples of such
image maintenance abound. As early as 1540, Castañeda, the
chronicler of the Coronado expedition, reported that Pueblo women made
"jars of extraordinary labor and workmanship, which were worth
seeing" (quoted in Foote and Schackel 1986: 21). Olla maidens are
featured prominently in the sketches of the pueblos included in the
1848 Emory Report (see figure 2). In her essays of 1880s New
Mexico subsequently reprinted as The Land of the Pueblos (1891),
Susan Wallace described both Pueblo and Hispanic women carrying
jugs of water as "maidens of Palestine." In the same decade, William
Henry Jackson, "the Father of the Picture Postcard," photographed
"Water Carriers" at San Juan for stereoscope viewing (figure 13).
And in 1890 anthropologist John G. Owens wrote a letter describing
a scene at Zuni Pueblo: "Just before dark, the squaws all go to the
spring to get an olla of water. I went over this evening to see them.
It reminded me of the pictures of Palestine. . . . It certainly is a classic
sight."5
Edward Curtis's imaging of Southwestern Native Americans in the
early decades of this century also features olla maidens. In 1903 he,
too, captured a "classic sight" at the river at Zuni (figure 14) and, in 1904, several "Water Girls" returning from the spring at Acoma (figure 15). Within the past decade, the same Acoma spring has served as the backdrop for a contemporary postcard image posed and photographed by Lee Marmon (figure 16). This would appear to be the same woman featured on the cover of the Insight Guide (see figure 1). In addition to countless verbal and visual images, the most effective form of image maintenance and literal re-presentation of the Pueblo woman as "subject-producer-of-objects" in the past century
have been the native crafts demonstrations that became commonplace and increasingly popular at World's Fairs, at Fred Harvey/Santa
Fe Railroad tourist stops, such as Hopi House at the Grand Canyon,
at museums, and at national parks.
While it was once true that "among all the pueblos the one type
of pottery which universally prevails is the tinaja or water jar" (Austin 1934: 1), it is also true that "the non-Western woman [and the day
vessel that she shapes and carries] is the vehicle for misplaced Western
nostalgia" (Ong 1988: 85). Countless statements and images such as
the preceding attest not only that the author is speaking for and
representing her, but that she is valued because she is, if only in his
imaginary projections, outside history, outside industrial capitalism.
For many decades now, Pueblo women have rarely worn mantas on
an everyday basis or walked around with pots on their heads unless
they were paid to do so. This is aesthetic primitivism and this is a
form of colonial domination–a gaze which fixes and objectifies,
which masters.6 Both Bhabha and Ong have pointed out that "colonial discourse produces the colonized as a fixed reality which is at
once an 'other' and yet entirely knowable and visible" (Bhabha 1983: 23); that "by and large, non-Western women are taken as an unproblematic universal category" (Ong 1988: 82). In "the language of occupation," women are "receptacles and products of desire" (Minh-ha 1987: 8); repeatedly, "a female colored body serves as a site of attraction and symbolic appropriation" (Clifford 1988: 5). Or, as Susanne Kappeler points out, "in the structure of representation, the two subjects are the author and the spectator/reader, the white man and his guests. The woman is the object of exchange" (1986: 51).
For example, in the 1920s a marketable romantic image of Zuni women at the spring was sold as a Frashers Fotos postcard (figure 17), in contrast to the more probable and realistic scene described by anthropologist Li An-Che in 1937:
Fetching water from the well or cisterns, is, as of old, a good opportunity for arranging a liaison. The difference lies only in the fact that water vessels of pottery were once on the heads of the maidens and now water buckets are in their hands. (1937: 73)
I probably don't need to tell you that I have not found a single image of a Pueblo woman with a water bucket, although it is a subject of discussion in Ema Fergusson's essay on the Pueblos in Our Southwest (1940: 298), and an occasion for nostalgic aestheticism on her part as well:
A Taos girl, asked what she wanted for a wedding present, answered: 'A bucket.'
Nothing has more captivated painters and photographers than
the Pueblo woman fetching water in a painted jar on her head.
Grace of line and beauty of color; and a symbol, too, of a primitive life away from the world's hurlyburly. For the woman dipping a tinaja into Pueblo Creek is taking water that comes sparkling from the sacred Blue Lake. Yet the Taos bride wanted a bucket with a handle for greater ease in doing the work she
had to do. I wondered if she could use her bright tin pail without losing something important that went with the hand-made
jar–a sense of god-given water from a sacred place. She will
surely lose the god and with him much hocus-pocus and
superstitious fear. But can she, while taking on new ways and
new concepts, keep the old reverence for life-giving natural
things, the ability to use them without abuse, to share them
without degrading herself or another? For this is what the
ancient pueblo life had; this is what modem life threatens; this
is the problem that faces every young Pueblo Indian.
In the 1920s, Odd Halseth of the School of American Research in
Santa Fe encouraged pottery revivals of this "lost art" at Zia and
Jemez pueblos, and patronizingly described the aesthetic and financial successes that resulted from his overcoming the resistance of traditional religious leaders in El Palacio. "But," he hastened to add
(1926: 149), "of more worth than money is the creative pride which
again is coming into the lives of the Jemez people. Women with
figures erect and with jars of their own making gracefully balanced
on their heads once more wend their way to the springs, and the sight
of some sister who stiff struggles, stoop-shouldered, with the burden
of a tin water bucket in each hand brings smiles of realization to their
faces." "Maids of Palestine" don't carry tin buckets, and whether at
Taos, Jemez, or Zuni, said buckets are clearly an impediment to the
"artistic mystification" of ethnicity (Rodríguez 1989: 93).
I have already implicated Edward Said's Orientalism in my argument because I think that the Southwest is America's Orient. Like
the Orient, the Southwest is an idea that has "a history and a tradition of thought, imagery, and vocabulary that have given it reality
and presence in and for" the rest of America (Said 1979: 5). And, as
both visual and verbal images amply attest, this tradition is explicitly
figured in the trope of orientalism. "How strangely parallel,' Cushing thought at Zuni in 1879 as he sat watching the women coming from and going to the well, "have been the lines of development in this curious civilization of an American desert, with those of Eastern nations and deserts?" (1882: 197). Such statements reveal not only orientalism but what de Certeau (1980: 42) described as the "eroticism of the origin." Repeatedly, "travellers passing the Pueblo villages of the Southwest in the eighties were invited to recall the villages of ancient Egypt and Nubia, Ninevah and Babylon, rather than to study the remains of American aboriginal life; the people were 'like the descendents of Rebecca of Bible fame'" (Pomeroy 1957: 39). Contrary to what Pomeroy implies, however, such orientalizing was not simply a phenomenon of the 1880s. In 1896, Philip Embury Harroun won a $10 prize from Eastman Kodak for a photo of a San
Juan Pueblo woman entitled "A New Mexican Rebecca" (figure 18).In 1920 Harriet Monroe compared Pueblo dances to Homeric rites
and Egyptian ceremonies (quoted in Weigle and Fiore 1982: 17). In
luring Santa Fe Railroad travelers on "Indian Detours," Ema Fergusson asserted that the Southwest offered "exotic spectacles which can
be equaled in few Oriental lands" (quoted Thomas 1978: 196).
And, recalling a San Geronimo's Day from her childhood, Cleofas
Jaramillo described the scene at Taos Pueblo as follows (1955: 18):
In the pueblo houses, Indian women bearing great water jars
on their heads climbed steep ladders with grace and poise, and
glided softly into their neatly whitewashed rooms. Indian men,
resembling oriental Arabs and Egyptians, shrouded in white cotton mantles, stood on the high roofs–white sentinels against
the blue vault of heaven. Their call was strikingly oriental.
Can one doubt that this is less a description of Pueblo life than of
the viewer's desire "to fix the Other in a stable and stabilizing identity" (Owens 1983: 75)? In this romantic dichotomizing and essentializing discourse that modern industrial America began producing about the Southwest in the late nineteenth century the image of an olla maiden is a primary and privileged signifier–one in which considerable material investment has been made and continues to be made. There is no doubt about it–the nostalgic aestheticism of the 1880s has persisted at great profit for more than a century. Not insignificantly, this authorized image of the "civilized," domestic, and feminized Pueblo was popularized at the very moment when "wild"
nomadic Apaches were stiff killing white people and eluding General Crook in the same Southwestern spaces. Late-nineteenth-century authors such as Susan Wallace repeatedly juxtapose the "peace-loving," "pastoral," "maidens of Palestine" with the savage, bloodthirsty "Bedouin."
At the same time, the arts-and-crafts movement was fostering antiquarianism and producing such statements as the following concerning the revitalization of pottery making among the women of Cincinnati: "Handling dear old mother earth does not leave much time for hysteria."7 For an America that saw premodern craftsmanship as an antidote for modern ills; a technological America desirous of elegant articles of common use with, in Charles Eliot Norton's words, "something of human life in them," what better than the "timeless, authentic beauty" of a Pueblo pot (quoted in Lears 1981: 66). And who
better than a primitive woman who, as Evans-Pritchard has assured
us, 'does not desire things to be other than they are" (1965: 45). An
Indian mother shaping Mother Earth and gracefully carrying her
burdens was and is, indeed, something of a bourgeois dream of an
alternative redemptive life, as well as an imagistic transformation of
an unmanageable native into a manageable one. As Marta Weigle
(1989: 121) has suggested, both the collecting of Pueblo potteries
and the repeated imaging of Pueblo women as "civilized" artisans
making, using, or selling their wares, to tourists signify the transformation and domestication of the "savage" nearly naked male warrior
of the first Santa Fe Railroad publications. Modern power, Foucault
(1977) argues, replaces violence and force with the "gentler" constraint of uninterrupted visibility, "the gaze."
This simultaneous glorification both of the exotic and of the cult
of domesticity in the imaging of Native American women was a common rhetorical strategy, particularly in the writings of women. What began perhaps in Margaret Fuller's Summer on the Lakes, published in 1844, achieved something of an apotheosis a century later in Alice Marriott's Maria, published in 1948. In the intervening century
countless studies of the primitive woman artisan, from Otis Mason's
Woman's Share in Primitive Culture (1894) to Ruth Bunzel's The
Pueblo Potter (1929), not only emphasize the picturesqueness of the
everyday, but reinforce the cult of domesticity by allying women's
arts with the utilitarian, and the secular and men's with the ritual and
the sacred.8 Ruth Underhill is not alone in erroneously asserting that
"every woman made, her own" pots (1944: 71). Archaeologists also
expressed a domestic, utilitarian, and anti-commercial bias regarding
Pueblo ceramics, for prior to Anna Shepard's studies in the 1930s,
the mistaken view was widely held that each household produced its
own pottery (Cordell 1986). Marriott's portrayal of Maria and Julian
Martinez as a husband and wife pottery-making team makes the
domestication of the Pueblo complete (figure 19).
Woman as maker and user of pottery with man as helpmate combines not only exotic and domestic but aesthetic and utilitarian stereotypes into one desirable image of heterosexual romance. This domestication of the exotic and presentation of the Pueblo as "a peaceful, home-loving people," is evident even in children's picture
books such as the Kellogg's Indian of the Southwest published in
1936. After several scenes of Pueblo homes and lifestyle, they introduce a photograph of an olla maiden with the following text:
Indian women often carry jars on their heads for long distances, or up and down ladders, without touching them with their
hands. When the Pueblo Indian mother needs water to use in
her home, she takes a large jar to the well or river, fills it with
water, then fitting the little hollow in the.bottom of the jar
onto her head, she carries it home.
In addition, the book contains three images of pottery making: a
firing scene, a mother teaching her 'little daughter' how to make
pottery, and María and Julian Martinez painting and, polishing pottery "in front of the fireplace in their home" (Kellogg and Kellogg 1936). In adult picture books such as Laura Gilpin's The Pueblos: A Camera Chronicle (1941), the Pueblo are similarly presented as peaceful, civilized, domestic, and artistic-they have an inherent sense of beauty" (124). Here, too, the preponderance of images are of women
and of women and pots. The much photographed Acoma waterhole
is the frontispiece; there also is an image of an Acoma water carrier,
and we are told that "here the Indian women come at evening when
the sun casts its late colorfull rays, and the fortunate visitors may see a
procession of graceful women with beautiful waterfilled ollas (ol-yas)
balanced on their heads winding up the trail from the cistern to their
homes" (114). Precisely as they were imaged by Curtis thirty-five
years earlier (see figure 15).
This "relegation of the tribal or primitive to either a vanishing
past or an ahistorical, conceptual present (Clifford 1988: 201)
influences not only the Western valuation, but the production and
consumption of ethnic art, and that, in turn, profoundly affects gender
relations within tribal communities with regard to the reproduction
of culture for sale. Scholars as well as popularizers have been
consistent in their refusal to see Pueblo women in their "psychological
social, and colonial complexity" (Carr 1988: 150). Natives, especially
female artisan natives were, as Sylvia Rodríguez has pointed out
(1989: 93), co-opted into "scripted ethnic stereotypes, not merely as
part of the inevitable choreography of denial that characterized face-
to-face interracial relations in contemporary America, but with
increasing psychosocial investment in the fiction it perpetuated."
"They learned to market, as well as elaborate, their own ethnicity"; they reproduced "ancient pottery" and turned culture into commodity (see figure 11); in the process they assumed powers and prerogatives that were once their husbands'.9 The olla maiden stereotype has had profound economic and political, as well as aesthetic consequences, which need to be acknowledged and investigated. Consequences which demonstrate the degree to which "the imagination at the frontier constitutes a fantasized construction of self and other–one in which colonist and Indian synergetically interact to create a totally imagined reality. This reality is no less real for all its construction and has a life and destructive force all of its own" (Kapferer 1988: 83).
Although there are a few images of Laguna women meeting (such as figure 11) or of Tesuque potters shaping "raingods" or "lucky bucks" for the tourists in, for example, a 193Os souvenir folder of "American Indian Life," such commercial scenes are clearly not the preferred images, the "fantasized construction" of Pueblo Indians and their pots. "Tourist art" is disparaged, history is airbrushed out, and "authenticity" is mutually fabricated.10 A romantic pastoral informed by a domestic use-and-beauty bias, exemplified in a 1935 Parkhurst photograph taken at Laguna Pueblo, was and is the privileged, the marketable "reality" (figure 20). Clearly, Ruth Benedict did not invent the stereotype of the peaceful, poetic, feminine Pueblo. She simply gave it the name "Apollonian." To the extent that potteries are seen at all as containers of cultural value as well as art objects to decorate Anglo lives, they are described as reiterating, affirming this world view. The idea that conflict as well as clay may be shaped in Pueblo ceramics is virtually absent from the literature. Nor is this view specific to the Pueblo, for it is widely assumed that primitive and folk art is tradition-bound and conflict-free.11
As a consequence of Anglo taste and modern reproductive technology, we cannot escape this mythic and synchronic vision of the Pueblo woman and her pottery. In addition to such frequently reproduced vintage scenes as I have included in this essay, images of olla maidens by contemporary Indian as well as Anglo artists such as Gorman, Peña, and Redbird or Stefan, Rochester, and Schenck are now available everywhere as postcards, notecards, advertisements, T-shirts, posters, etc. An arrangement of bronze olla maidens is the sculpture at the New Mexico State Capitol Building in Santa Fe, and this in turn is sold as a postcard and used to promote tourism (figure 21). Whether Anglo or Indian, these artists have very different ideas about mudwomen than Nora Naranjo-Morse does. Fictions that sell. Most people don't want Pearlene with all her ambiguity of dependency and rupture (see figure 5), for "man dreams of an Other not only to possess her but also to be ratified by her" (deBeauvoir 1974: 170). They want those shiny black Santa Clara pots that look like "ancient" potteries are supposed to, and they want their women carrying them. A vision of authenticity, of timeless, useful, and subjugated beauty.
In fin-de-siecle remarks that an "immense amount of romance is wasted on the old mud houses" and "tiresome pottery fragments," Susan Wallace (1891: 13), might well be describing present-day Santa Fe. The current fetishization of the Pueblo in general and of mud houses and mudwomen and mud jars in particular exemplifies Judith Williamson's assertion (1986: 110-12) that
the need of our society both to engulf Others and to exploit 'otherness' is not only a structural and ideological phenomenon; it has been at the root of the very development of capitalism, founded as it is on imperialist relations.... Economically, we need the Other, even as politically we seek to eliminate it.... Capitalism feeds on different value systems and takes control of them, while nourishing their symbolic difference from itself ... different systems of production ... which are suppressed by capitalism are then incorporated into its imagery and ideological values: as 'otherness,' old-fashioned, charming, exotic, natural, primitive, universal.
When "mudwoman encounters the world of money and business" she cannot but confront the nostalgic aestheticism, synchronic essentialism, feminization, and utilitarian biases that have shaped the Anglo valuation and imaging of Pueblo potteries and Pueblo women. Among other things, Pearlene is likely to discover that "tradition remains the sacred weapon oppressors repeatedly hold up whenever the need to maintain their privileges, hence to impose the form of the old on the content of the new, arises" (Minh-ha 1989: 106); that women are "the very ground of representation, both object and support of a desire which, intimately bound up with power and creativity, is the moving force of culture and history" (deLauretis 1984: 13), and that "commodities, women, are a mirror of value of and for men" (Irigaray 1985: 177), men who, with their technologies of representation and reproduction, define and control the Other through total aestheticization and uninterrupted visibility.
FOOTNOTES
- Significant portions of this essay were originally written for presentation at a conference on gender and material culture at Winterthur Museum in October 1989. That essay, "Mudwomen and Whitemen: A Meditation on Pueblo Potteries and the Politics of Representation," is forthcoming in Kenneth Ames and Katharine Martinez, eds. The Material Culture of Gender/The Gender of material Culture (New York: W.W. Norton, 1991). Now as then, I am indebted to Kit Hinsley, who has inspired, sustained, and contributed to this re-visioning, and to Jay Cox, for invaluable library and computer assistance.
- See Bennett (1946: 364) for discussion of the tendency in anthropology to
privilege "the organic wholeness of preliterate life in contrast to the heterogeneity and diffusiveness of modern civilization." In Southwestern ethnology in particular he argues, "these tendencies may often assume a special form conditioned by the pervading sense of mystery and glamour of the country itself."
- For development of the idea of "symbolic capital," see Bourdieu (1977).
- This clipping was inserted on an unnumbered page following p. 32 in James Stevenson's "Scrapbook A" Laboratory of Anthropology Library, Santa Fe, NM.
- Letter from John G. Owens to Deborah Stratton, July 20, 1890, John G. Owens Papers, Peabody Museum Archives, Harvard University. My thanks to Kit Hinsley, who is editing this correspondence and called it to my attention.
- For further discussion of "aesthetic primitivism" in the representation of Native American women, see Carr (1985; 1998). For discussion of the matter concerning native women generally see Minh-na (1987; 1989).
- This statement appeared in an anonymous article, "Cincinnati Art Pottery," in Harper's Weekly No. 1202 (January 10, 1880): 342. Again, my thanks to Kit Hinsley for providing this material.
- A more recent example of separating Native American secular, utilitarian arts from
scared, ritual ones along gender lines is the essay by Cohodas and DeMott (1985).
- For further discussion of the effects of the commodification of ethnicity and of pottery revivals in particular on Pueblo gender arrangements and community organization, see Wade (1986) and Babcock (1988).
- For discussion of the production of authenticity by removing objects from their current historical situation, see Clifford (1988: 228). Minh-ha (1989: 89ff.) similarly discusses "planned authenticity" as a "product of hegemony" which "constitutes an efficacious means of silencing the cry of racial oppression." Rodriguez (1989: 83) makes the same point regarding the Indian paintings of the Taos painters.
- Only two essays have dealt with the relationship between conflict and ceramics, between politics and potteries, and those quite recently: Wade (1986) and Babcock (1988).
REFERENCES
|
An-Che, Li
|
|
1937 | "Zuni: Some Observations and Queries." American Anthropologist 39: 62-76.
|
|
Austin, Mary
|
|
1934 | Indian Pottery of the Rio Grande. Pasadena: Esto Publishing Co.
|
|
Babcock, Barbara A.
|
|
1988 | "'At Home, No Womens are Storytellers': Potteries, Stories, and Politics in Cochiti Pueblo." Journal of the Southwest 30(3): 356-89.
|
|
1991 | "Mudwomen and Whitemen: A Meditation on Pueblo Potteries and the Politics of Representation." In Kenneth Ames and Kathanne Martinez, eds. The Material Culture of Gender/The Gender of Material Culture. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
|
|
Benedict, Ruth E.
|
|
1934 | Patterns of Culture. Boston: Houghton Co.
|
|
Bennett, John W.
|
|
1946 | "The Interpretation of Pueblo Culture: A Question of Values." Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 2(4): 361-74.
|
|
Bhabha, Homi K.
|
|
1983 | "The Other Question: Difference, Discrimination and the Discourse of Colonialism." Screen 24: 18-36.
|
|
Bourdieu, Pierre
|
|
1977 | Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
Bunmi, Ruth
|
|
1972 | The Pueblo Potter: A Study of Creative Imagination in Primitive Art [1929] New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
|
|
Carr, Helen
|
|
1985 | "Woman/Indian: 'The American' and His Others." In Francis Barker, Peter Hulme, Margaret Iverson, and Diana Loxley, eds. Europe and Its Others: Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, vol. 2, Colchester: University of Essex, 46-60.
|
|
1988 | "In Other Words: Native American Women's Autobiography." In Bella Brodzki and Celeste Schenck, eds. Life/Lines. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 131-53.
|
|
Clifford, James
|
|
1988 | The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
|
|
Cohodas, Marvin, and Barbara DeMott
|
|
1985 | "Meaning in Women's Arts of North America." Phoebus 4: 99-105.
|
|
Cordell, Linda
|
|
1986 | "Women Archaeologists in the Southwest." Paper prepared for Daughters of the Desert Symposium, Wenner-Gren Foundation. March 12-23, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
Cushing, Frank Hamilton
|
|
1882 | "My Adventures in Zuni." The Century Magazine 25 (1): 191-207.
|
|
deBeauvoir, Sirnone
|
|
1974 | The Second Sex. New York: Vantage Books, 170.
|
|
de Certeau, Michel
|
|
1980 | "Writing vs. Time: History and Anthropology in the Works of Lafitau." Yale French Studies 59: 37-64.
|
|
deLauretis, Teresa
|
|
1984 | Alice Doesn't: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
|
|
Evans-Pritchard, E. E.
|
|
1965 | The Position of Women in Primitive Societies and Other Essays in Social Anthropology. New York: The Free Press.
|
|
Fergusson, Ema
|
|
1940 | Our Southwest. New York: Alfred A. Knopf
|
|
Foote, Cheryl J., and Sandra K. Schackel
|
|
1986 | "Indian Women of New Mexico, 1535-1680." In Joan Jensen and Darlis A. Miller, eds. New Mexico Women: Intercultural Perspectives. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 17-40.
|
|
Foucault, Michel
|
|
1977 | Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
|
|
Fuller, S. M.
|
|
1844 | Summer on the Lakes, in 1843. Boston: Charles C. Little & James Brown.
|
|
Gilpin, Laura
|
|
1941 | The Pueblos: A Camera Chronicle. New York: Hastings House Publishers.
|
|
Gordon, Deborah
|
|
1986 | "Among Women: Gender and Ethnographic Authority in the Southwest, 1930-1980." Paper prepared for Daughters of the Desert Symposium, Wenner-Gren Foundation. March 12-23, Tucson, AZ.
|
|
Halseth, Odd S.
|
|
1926 | "The Revival of Pueblo Pottery Making." El Palacio 21(6): 135-54.
|
|
Irigaray, Luce
|
|
1985 | This Sex Which Is Not One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
|
|
Jaramillo, Cleofas
|
|
1955 | Romance of a Little Village Girl. San Antonio: Naylor.
|
|
Kapferer, Bruce
|
|
1988 | "The Anthropologist as Hero: Three Exponents of Post-Modernist Anthropology." Critique of Anthropology 8 (2): 77-104.
|
|
Kappeler, Susanne
|
|
1986 | The Pornography of Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
|
|
Kellogg, Harold, and Delain Kellogg
|
|
1936 | Indians of the Southwest. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.
|
|
Lears, T. J. Jackson
|
|
1981 | No Place of Grace: Anti-modernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880-1920. New York: Pantheon Books.
|
|
Marriott, Alice
|
|
1948 | Maria: The Potter of San Ildefonso. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
|
|
Mason, Otis
|
|
1894 | Woman's Share in Primitive Culture. New York:, D. Appleton & Company.
|
|
Minh-ha, Trinh T.
|
|
1987 | "She, the Inappropriate/d Other." Discourse 8: 1-37.
|
|
1989 | Woman, Native, Other: Writing, Postcoloniality and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
|
|
Ong, Aihwa
|
|
1988 | "Colonialism and Modernity: Feminist Re-Presentations of Women in Non-Westem Societies." In Deborah Gordon, ed. "Feminism and the Critique of Colonial Discourse." Inscription 314: 79-93.
|
|
Owens, Craig
|
|
1983 | "The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Post Modernism." In Thc Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Post Modern Culture, edited by Hal Foster, 57-82. Port Townsend, Washington: Bay Press.
|
|
Pomeroy, E.
|
|
1957 | In Search of the Golden West: The Tourist in Western America. New York: Alrted A. Knopf.
|
|
Rodriguez, Sylvia
|
|
1989 | "Art, Tourism, and Race Relations in Taos: Toward a Sociology of the Art Colony." Journal of Anthropological Research 45: 77-99.
|
|
Said, Edward W.
|
|
1979 | Orientalism. New York: Vantage Books.
|
|
Thomas, D. H.
|
|
1978 | The Southwestern Indian Detours: The Story of the Fred Harvey/Santa Fe Railway Experiment in "Detourism." Phoenix: Hunter Publishing.
|
|
Todorov, Tzvetan
|
|
1984 | The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other. New York: Harper & Row.
|
|
Underhill, Ruth M.
|
|
1938 | First Penthouse Dwellers of America. New York: J. J. Augustin.
|
|
1944 | Pueblo Crafts. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs.
|
|
Wade, Edwin L.
|
|
1986 | "Straddling the Cultural Fence: The Conflict for Ethnic Artists within Pueblo Societies." In Edwin L. Wade, ed. The Arts of the North American Indian: Native Traditions in Evolution. New York: Hudson Hills Press, 243-54.
|
|
Wallace, Susan
|
|
1891 | The Land of the Pueblos. New York: Columbian Publishing. Co.
|
|
Weigle, Marta
|
|
1989 | "From Desert to Disney World: The Santa Fe Railway and the Fred Harvey Company Display the Indian Southwest." Journal of Anthropological Research 45: 115-37.
|
|
Weigle, Marta, and Kyle Fiore
|
|
1982 | Santa Fe and Taos: The Writer's Era, 1916-1941. Santa Fe: Ancient City Press.
|
|
Williamson, Judith
|
|
1986 | "Woman Is an Island: Femininity and Colonization." In Tania Modleski, ed. Studies in Entertainment: Critical Approaches to Mass Culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 99-118.
|
|